Legal Opinion

State v. Savan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1934PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

On January 18, 1934, the defendants Edward Savan and Oscar Sherman were jointly indicted by the grand jury of Multnomah county for the crime of receiving stolen property. The indictment recites that said defendants on December 16, 1933, in Multnomah county then and there being, did then and there unlawfully and feloniously “buy, receive, have and conceal certain personal property, to-wit 26 suits of men’s clothing, all being the personal property of Clarence Wiekenden and Eric Wiekenden, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Wickenden’s . * * * and which said property had…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Brown v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Howard v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1906

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Noble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. State v. RedemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API