Porter v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.
The principal issue in this criminal case is whether, during the jury selection phase of the case, conversations at the bench between the trial judge and certain prospective jurors regarding the ability of those jurors to serve beyond their scheduled term constituted a "stage of the trial” at which the defendants had a.right to be present.
The defendants, Orville Joseph Porter and Wayne Preston Morris, were each charged with a sexual offense in the first degree and were tried jointly in the Criminal Court of Baltimore. At the beginning of the jury selection process, the trial court advised the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Robert G. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Dutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- United States v. John J. Houlihan and Martin LegereCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Perez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Noble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.