Legal Opinion
Whittle v. Moschella
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 31, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-550 (CRR)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
The pro se plaintiff 1 filed the above-captioned suit based on his claims that the defendants Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI"), FBI employee Emil P. Mos-chella, FBI Director William Sessions, Attorney General Richard L. Thornburgh and the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) have failed to comply with his requests for records pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. The plaintiff also asks the Court to order defendants Sessions, Thornburgh, FBI, and DOJ to conduct an…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice, (Two Cases). Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Federal Bureau of Investigation v. AbramsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Wightman-Cervantes v. MuellerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Prison Legal News v. LappinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Ransom v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Taylor v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Voinche v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.