Legal Opinion
In re the Answer to the Communication of His Excellency Governor Roosevelt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 26, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The Executive’s letter incloses a petition and a letter from a correspondent. The petition is signed by about 533 persons, 216 of whom do not reside in Kings or Queens or Richmond county, and one of them is a resident of New Jersey.
In the correspondent’s letter it is stated: “ That your Excellency will notice from the documents you have in your possession that eight City Magistrates of Brooklyn have recently been the subject of publicity in connection with their duties.
“ Four have been named in connection with illegal proceedings in commitment of wayward minors.
*24“ Three have recently been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Deordio v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- People ex rel. Pogoda v. Superintendent of Wayside Home for Girls, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Marín BáezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- Wisconsin State AFL-CIO v. Elections BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
- WISCONSIN STATE AFL-CIO v. Elections Bd.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
- In re Marín BáezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- Weiss v. SprayregenNew York Supreme Court · 1950