Legal Opinion

State v. Whitehead

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 13, 1983No. 82-2458PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Whitehead, contending that Section 316.-1932(l)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1982), which provides, inter alia, that:

“The refusal to submit to a chemical breath or urine test upon the request of a law enforcement officer as provided in this section shall be admissible into evidence in any criminal proceeding.”

unconstitutionally violates his privilege against self-incrimination, successfully moved in limine to prohibit the State from eliciting any testimony concerning, or commenting upon, the defendant’s refusal to submit to a test to determine the alcoholic content of his blood. The order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. SowersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Izaak Walton League of America v. MONROE CTY.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. State v. BalboaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. State v. TurkelCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API