State v. Balboa
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceSchwartz, Chief Judge
(specially concurring).
I have already expressed and now repeat my extreme doubts about the correctness of the determination in State v. Steinbrecher, 409 So.2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) that, as a general rule, certiorari lies at the state’s behest to review non-final orders in criminal prosecutions. State v. Whitehead, 443 So.2d 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (Schwartz, C.J., specially concurring); State v. C.C., 449 So.2d 280, 282 n. 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (Schwartz, C.J., specially concurring).
Apart from being bound by this conclusion notwithstanding my disagreement with it, State v. Whitehead, supra,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SteinbrecherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- State v. C.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Stuart v. Hertz Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Robbins v. PfeifferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Jones v. KnuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.