Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Balboa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 22, 1985No. 84-2505Published

1ConcurrenceSchwartz, Chief Judge

(specially concurring).

I have already expressed and now repeat my extreme doubts about the correctness of the determination in State v. Steinbrecher, 409 So.2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) that, as a general rule, certiorari lies at the state’s behest to review non-final orders in criminal prosecutions. State v. Whitehead, 443 So.2d 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (Schwartz, C.J., specially concurring); State v. C.C., 449 So.2d 280, 282 n. 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (Schwartz, C.J., specially concurring).

Apart from being bound by this conclusion notwithstanding my disagreement with it, State v. Whitehead, supra,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SteinbrecherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. State v. C.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Stuart v. Hertz Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Robbins v. PfeifferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Jones v. KnuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API