Legal Opinion

State v. Webster

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2017No. 20160155PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kapsner, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jacob Webster appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury returned a general verdict finding him guilty of driving under the influence. Because a driver may not be criminally convicted for refusing a warrantless blood test incident to arrest under Birchfield v. North Dakota, - U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2160, 195 L.Ed.2d 560 (2016), we conclude the general verdict finding Webster guilty of driving under the influence under an instruction alternatively criminalizing the refusal to submit to a warrantless blood test incident to arrest was not harmless error beyond a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. State v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. KruckenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Aamodt v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dettler v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GaddieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. BerkleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  3. State v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. GaddieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. BeltranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API