Legal Opinion

Mauer v. ICON Health and Fitness, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided March 4, 2020No. 6:18-cv-02009Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION MARLENE MAUER, Plaintiff, No. C18-2009-LTS vs. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS, INC., MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. ___________________________ I. INTRODUCTION This case is before me on a motion (Doc. No. 24) for summary judgment filed by defendant ICON Health and Fitness, Inc. (ICON). Plaintiff Marlene Mauer has filed a resistance (Doc. No. 25) and ICON has filed a reply (Doc. No. 26). I find that oral argument is not necessary. See Local Rule 7(c). II.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Hartnagel v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API