Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Starks

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 2, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Morris, Commissioner

Affirming.

The first of several acts out of which arose the pres ent controversy occurred on January 10, 1914, when J. B. Starks, as principal, and appellant John W. Hunt and appellee C. J. Hicks as sureties, executed a note to the First National Bank of Scottsville in the sum of $1,250.

'The note was not paid at maturity, and on September 28, 1914, the bank sued principal and sureties, obtaining judgment against them for the amount of the note plus interest from the date of its execution. Starks never paid any part of the debt, it falling to the two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Marcum v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Vanmeter v. Fidelity Trust & Safety Vault Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estrada v. Corte Municipal de CialesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936
  2. Estrada v. Municipal Court of CialesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API