Legal Opinion

Overton v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1978No. 17062PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

John W. Overton and William E. Averyt filed suit against the City of Houston and certain of its officers for a mandamus to compel payment of termination pay. The trial was to the court without a jury. The case was submitted to the court upon an agreed stipulation of facts and certain documentary evidence. Judgment was rendered for the defendant city solely by reason of the two year statute of limitation, Article 5526, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes. The judgment will be affirmed.

The plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in applying the two year statute of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. BurchTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Cowart v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Rose v. First St. Bk. of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The City of Houston v. Steve WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cornerstones Municipal Utility District v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Muss v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. Evis Marcotte v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. O'QUINN v. Chambers County, Tex.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API