Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Miller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1930No. 29,219PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants to recover damages sustained by her on account of the fraud of the defendants in selling to her certain real property in Kansas City, Mo. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants on the pleadings and admissions of the plaintiff at the time of the trial. The plaintiff appeals.

*66The petition alleged that the defendants fraudulently induced the plaintiff to purchase real property from the McCanles Securities Company and other real property from the McCanles-Miller Realty…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Glenn v. LiggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Lewis' Adm'r v. GlennSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wells, Administrator v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Rost v. HeykaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Hall v. DoeringDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  4. Hall v. DoeringDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API