Legal Opinion
Medlock v. Rumsfeld
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 4, 2003No. CIV.A.DKC 2002-1093PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this employment discrimination case brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), et seq. (“Title VII”) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701-797 (“Rehabilitation Act”), is the motion to dismiss or for summary judgment of Defendant Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of the United States Department of Defense (“DOD”). The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons that follow, the court shall grant…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sillah v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Hart v. LewDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Lumsden Ex Rel. Estate of Lumsden v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Ledo Pizza System, Inc. v. SinghDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Wilcoxon v. DECO Recovery Management, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.