McLaughlin v. Ogle
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The motion to dismiss this appeal must prevail. It has been settled by repeated decisions that a judgment is subject to the control of the Court until the lapse of the term at which it was rendered, and that from an order striking it out, passed upon a motion made during that term, no appeal lies. Rutherford vs. Pope, 15 Md., 579; Hall vs. Holmes, 30 Md., 558; Townsend vs. Chew, 31 Md., 247.
The record in this case shows that at the January Term, 1879, of the Court of Common Pleas, McLaughlin recovered a judgment against Ogle and Townsend for $180, and on the 22nd of January, during the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hall v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Rutherford v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- Townshend ex rel. W. & S. Wyman & Co. v. ChewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davidson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Tiller v. ElfenbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Wagner v. ScurlockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Murray v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Preston ex rel. Hamner v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.