Legal Opinion
Singh v. Davi
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 2012No. C068120PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUARTE, J.
Jeff Davi, as Commissioner (Commissioner) of the Department of Real Estate (DRE), denied Dave Singh’s application for a real estate broker’s license based on the “dishonest nature” of his prior conviction for theft by false pretenses and the concern that it would not be in the public interest to issue Singh a license. Singh petitioned for a writ of administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to set aside the Commissioner’s decision, contending that he was entitled to a broker’s license because he had met all criteria for rehabilitation. Finding the Commissioner failed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Patterson Flying Service v. Department of Pesticide RegulationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Mahoney v. San Francisco Employees' Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Pieri v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frye v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hardesty v. State Mining and Geology BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Hardesty v. State Mining and Geology BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Miller v. Dept. of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022