Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. San Francisco Employees' Retirement Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 17, 1973No. Civ. 30895PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
Appellant Jerry Mahoney, a member of the San Francisco Fire Department, applied to respondent San Francisco City and County Employees’ Retirement Board for industrial disability retirement benefits pursuant to section 171.1.3 of the city’s charter. Section 171.1.3, as relevant, provides that: “Any member of the fire department who becomes incapacitated for the performance of his duty by reason of any bodily injury received in, or illness caused by performance of his duty, shall be retired . . . .”
Mahoney’s application was denied following a hearing before the retirement…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Bailey v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re SturmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hadley v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- California Fair Employment & Housing Commission v. Gemini Aluminum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Zurn Engineers v. STATE OF CALIF., DEPT. WATER RESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Farmer v. City of InglewoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.