In Re the Annexation Proposed by Ordinance No. X-02-93
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARRARD, Judge.
This case involves an Indiana city's annexation of land. Landowners of the annexed property brought suit claiming that the statutorily required written plan was inadequate. The trial court dismissed the landowners' declaratory judgment action after determining their only remedy was through remonstrance. We affirm.
FACTS
The Common Council of the City of Fort Wayne passed an ordinance on March 9, 1993, annexing approximately 2775 acres of land commonly known as the North I Annexation Area (North I). Record at 22. The common council also approved a written fiscal plan for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Hobart v. ChidesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Deaton v. City of GreenwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Montagana v. City of ElkhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Reafsnyder v. City of WarsawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of New Haven v. ReichhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Common Coun. Mi City v. Bd. of Zoning App.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Annexation Ordinance F-2008-15 v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- City of Boonville v. American Cold StorageIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Fuehrer v. StormIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.