Nunfio v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MALONEY, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of aggravated sexual assault and his punishment was assessed at sixty-five years imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Nunfio v. State, 787 S.W.2d 143 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1990). We granted appellant’s petition to decide whether it was error to bar appellant from asking the venire “about the victim being a nun.”
Prior to appellant’s voir dire, the State urged a motion in limine about discussing the facts of the case. It appears that both the State and appellant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Cockrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Abron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.