Legal Opinion

Nunfio v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1991No. 453-90PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of aggravated sexual assault and his punishment was assessed at sixty-five years imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Nunfio v. State, 787 S.W.2d 143 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1990). We granted appellant’s petition to decide whether it was error to bar appellant from asking the venire “about the victim being a nun.”

Prior to appellant’s voir dire, the State urged a motion in limine about discussing the facts of the case. It appears that both the State and appellant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Cockrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Abron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API