Martin v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentMoore, Circuit Judge
I agree with the majority that we should vacate the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) to deny Robin Martin (“Martin”) benefits because substantial evidence did not support that decision. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to remand with instructions for the district court to remand the case for an award of benefits to Martin. Rather than instructing the district court to remand for an award of benefits, I would instruct remand so that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) might “reevaluate and provide [a] rationale for the weight given…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Janet L. FAUCHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, Ronald L. Faucher, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Harris v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Dorothy NEWKIRK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Ambrocio P. Igonia v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., as Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Murray v. SchweikerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1982