Legal Opinion

Dorothy NEWKIRK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1994No. 93-1421PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

This case arises from the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denying Dorothy Newkirk’s disability benefits claim under Title XYI of the Social Security Act. The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court had either the discretionary authority or an obligation to remand the case back to the Secretary under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

This issue was recently resolved by another panel in Faucher v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17 F.3d 171 (6th Cir.1994). Because the lower court’s holding in this ease is inconsistent with Faucher,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Janet L. FAUCHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, Ronald L. Faucher, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Jones v. BerryhillDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  2. Kennedy v. Comm Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Edwards v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  4. Hudson-Kane v. BerryhillDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
  5. Donahue v. MassanariDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API