Legal Opinion

Protexol Corp. v. Koppers Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 26, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff has moved to have this case transferred from the Non-Jury Calendar to the Jury list of causes.

The complaint recites three claims; infringement of a patent, wrongful use of trade secrets disclosed to defendant, and unfair competition in the use of a trademark. On each count, an injunction is sought against the illegal conduct alleged against defendant, together with an accounting for profits and damages resulting therefrom.

The trade secret and unfair competition claims are essentially equitable in nature. Injunctions are asked, and, in keeping with equity’s object…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Bereslavsky v. CaffeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Bereslavsky v. KloebCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. Bellavance v. Plastic-Craft Novelty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
  5. Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Eday Fabric Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Emmpresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Linkco, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Design Strategies, Inc. v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Railex Corp. v. Joseph Guss & Sons, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1966
  5. Shaffer v. Coty, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API