Legal Opinion
Railex Corp. v. Joseph Guss & Sons, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 10, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 2062-64PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, District Judge.
This cause came on for determination ■of defendants’ motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Title 28 U.S.C.A., on the ground of alleged failure of plaintiff to join an indispensable party in this civil action for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 281.
The essential question raised by this motion is whether plaintiff had the requisite title to the patents in suit at the time of filing the Complaint on August 21, 1964.
On November 21,' 1961 plaintiff had transferred title to the applications which later matured into the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trixler Brokerage Company, a California Corporation v. Ralston Purina Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Edward J. Kennedy, Henry Martinez, Herman Paprzycki and Dominick Stabilito v. Lakso Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Tavoulareas v. PiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
- Dominique v. Ralph D. Kaiser Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Crane Co. v. American Standard, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.