Legal Opinion

Hitt v. Maynard

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 5, 1979No. 78-234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellee was granted a divorce from appellant. The divorce decree recited that the court adopted a property settlement between the parties including appellant’s agreement to pay $75 a week as support for their 6 year old child. Subsequently, appellant sought a reduction of child support to $37.50 per week, asserting a material change of circumstances and his inability to continue making the agreed payment. The court found, as a matter of law, that he was without authority to modify the child support contract. Appellant asserts this was error and we agree.

A contract between…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lively v. LivelySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Collie v. CollieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Reiter v. ReiterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Guidelines for Child Support Enf.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. McInturff v. McInturffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Lake v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. McKiever v. McKieverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Dees v. DeesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API