Hitt v. Maynard
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Appellee was granted a divorce from appellant. The divorce decree recited that the court adopted a property settlement between the parties including appellant’s agreement to pay $75 a week as support for their 6 year old child. Subsequently, appellant sought a reduction of child support to $37.50 per week, asserting a material change of circumstances and his inability to continue making the agreed payment. The court found, as a matter of law, that he was without authority to modify the child support contract. Appellant asserts this was error and we agree.
A contract between…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lively v. LivelySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Collie v. CollieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Reiter v. ReiterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Guidelines for Child Support Enf.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- McInturff v. McInturffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Lake v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- McKiever v. McKieverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Dees v. DeesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989