Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dees v. Dees

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 31, 1989No. CA 88-345Published

1DissentJudith Rogers, Judge

I respectfully dissent. In order to fully explain my position, it is necessary to supplement the factual situation as described in the majority opinion.

In early September of 1986, appellee filed a petition for contempt,'alleging among other things that the appellant was delinquent in his payment of child support. Sometime later that month, appellee remarried. Appellee filed an amended petition in February of 1987, which reflected that fact as the style of the case shows her married name, Stone. A hearing was held on appellee’s petitions on May 6,1987. The appellant did not appear, although he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Penfield Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Dennison v. MobleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Jerry v. JerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Thurston v. PinkstaffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API