Legal Opinion

Apodaca v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 9, 2016No. AC37679PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The petitioner, Herman Apodaca, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court erred in concluding that he failed to prove ineffective assistance of his trial counsel because of counsel's failure to call a potential defense witness. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following facts regarding the underlying criminal conviction were set forth by our Supreme Court on direct appeal and restated by the habeas court. "In August, 2005, the [petitioner], a New York resident, met John Ortiz, a New…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Henry v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. Chace v. BronsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Crocker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. State v. ApodacaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hampton v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API