Legal Opinion
C.H. James & Co. v. Federal Food Marketers Co.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided May 29, 1996No. Civil Action 2:95-1119PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 The parties have submitted their respective memoranda and the matter is mature for the Court’s consideration. For reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED in its entirety.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The Amended Complaint alleges causes of action based upon breach of contract, 2 breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppel, misrepresentation, quasi-contract, forgery and outrage. 3 Plaintiffs assert the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. MatkariCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Phillip E. Bates, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Defendant v. C & S Adjusters, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-ClaimantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sadighi v. DaghighfekrDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1999
- McNeary-Calloway v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Lengacher v. RenoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- American Medical Facilities Management, LLC v. Vetcomm, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2022
- Concordia Pharmaceuticals Inc. S.A.R.L. v. Vitae Enim Vitae Scientific Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.