Legal Opinion

Lasma Corp. v. Monarch Insurance Co. of Ohio

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1988No. CV 87-0315-PRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Court of Appeals Judge.

The issue raised by this review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division 2, 159 Ariz. 55, 764 P.2d 1114 (App.1987) is whether the term “sound health” of an animal in a mortality insurance policy refers to, the actual health of the animal, the policyholder’s belief in the sound health of the animal, or something in between.

This matter was presented to a jury based upon the reasonable belief of the policyholder. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the policyholders, William C. Zekan and Betty Zekan (Zekans) in the sum of $116,000 as compensatory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. DevoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Lasma Corp. v. Monarch InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Voland v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Lucini-Parish Insurance v. BuckNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Milhone v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API