Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Devore
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*131MOSK, J.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (hereinafter Metropolitan) brought an action to cancel or rescind a 15-year mortgage term life insurance policy issued to Charles Devore. The complaint alleged that Metropolitan’s liability was conditioned on Devore’s “continued insurability” at the time the policy was delivered, that Devore was not in good health at the time of delivery and was aware of this fact, and that he had concealed material matters relating to his health in his application for insurance. Devore died after this action was filed and subsequently his widow and beneficiary of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gallant v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Marshall v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
- California Compensation & Fire Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Freedman v. Queen InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Baugh v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lunardi v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Ruth S. Miller v. Republic National Life Insurance Company, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lasma Corp. v. Monarch Insurance Co. of OhioArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Harte v. United Benefit Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Wanshura v. State Farm Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.