Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Pedro Q.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1989No. G006077PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

Pedro Q. appeals his California Youth Authority (CYA) commitment. In the published portion of this opinion, we consider his contentions that probation conditions restricting his travel were improperly imposed by the probation officer and were, in any event, unconstitutional.

I

In March 1986 Pedro was placed on juvenile probation for assault with a deadly weapon. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1).) The following terms were imposed: (1) commitment to Los Pinos Conservation Camp for nine months; (2) no association with members of “F-Troop,” a Santa Ana gang to which the minor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. People v. Todd L.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. ThrashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. Frankie J.California Court of Appeal · 1988

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Sheena K.California Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. O'NEILCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. LeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. Yun Ko TangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API