Legal Opinion

Boagni v. Stamen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1916No. 21086PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Landry; B. H. Pavy, Judge. Executory proceedings by E. M. Boagni against E. A. Stamen, in which William Edenborn and another, joint receivers of the Union Irrigation Company, filed a petition in intervention and third opposition. From the judgment, the interveners and third opponents appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, C. J.

Plaintiff caused a writ of seizure and sale to issue by virtue whereof the Alice B. plantation, in the parish of St. Landry, was seized and advertised to be sold on August 8, 1914, in satisfaction of a claim for the unpaid balance of the price, represented by the purchaser’s ten promissory notes for $2,000 each, of which one was past due according to its terms, and the others had matured, according to the contract between the vendor and vendee, by reason of the nonpayment at maturity of said past-due note, and all of which were secured by mortgage and vendor’s privilege, imposed and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Summers v. ClarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  2. Flower v. PearceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  3. Boagni v. SchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Boagni v. StamanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. KempLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Reimers v. HebertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Boagni v. SchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  4. Boagni v. StamenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Boagni v. StamenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API