Legal Opinion

Boagni v. Schell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 19, 1914No. 20785PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by Dr. Charles F. Boagni against J. F. Schell. Applications for writs of mandamus and prohibition by H. P. Dart and William Edenborn, third opponents.

1Opinion of the CourtProyosty, J.

The Union Irrigation Company was organized for the purpose of constructing and operating a canal for the irrigation of lands for the cultivation of rice.

J. Franklin Schell, the defendant in the main proceeding in this case, was its general manager, and in that capacity had “complete control over its operating affairs.” In November, 1912, he individually bought certain lands from Dr. Charles F. Boagni, the plaintiff in the main proceeding in this case. The purchase was made on a credit, and a vendor’s privilege was retained, and a mortgage stipulated, on said lands to secure this credit. A few…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gibson v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boagni v. StamenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Crowell Spencer Lumber Co. v. LynchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API