Boagni v. Staman
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by Dr. Charles IP. Boagni against Edward S. Staman. Applications for mandamus, and prohibition by H. P. Dart and William Edenborn, third opponents.
1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.
The Union Irrigation Company was organized for the purpose of constructing and operating a canal for the irrigation of lands for the cultivation of rice.
In May, 1913, E. A. Staman, the defendant in the main proceeding in this case, purchased from Dr. Charles E. Boagni, the plaintiff in the main proceeding in this case, five tracts of land. The purchase was made on a credit in part; and a vendor’s privilege was reserved, and a mortgage stipulated, on said lands to secure said credit. Shortly thereafter the Union Irrigation Company went into possession of said lands for cultivating rice, under…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Boagni v. StamenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916