Ronald Micklas v. J. Doe, No. 1

Ronald Micklas, proceeding pro se, 1 appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint against two unnamed Social Security reviewers and the Commissioner of Social Security. Micklas argues that the district court erred in dismissing his suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon review of the briefs and record, we affirm. 2

Micklas asserts his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which provides a remedy for deprivation of federal statutory and constitutional rights by a person acting under color of state law. Almand v. De-Kalb Cnty., 103 F.3d 1510, 1512-13 (11th Cir.1997). Micklas’s…