Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Sheely

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided July 3, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00211Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION PATRICK NEAL ANDERSON, * * Plaintiff, * * vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 24-00211-KD-B * BEN E. SHEELY, * * Defendant. * ORDER This action is before the Court on review. Plaintiff Patrick Neal Anderson (“Anderson”), who is proceeding without an attorney, filed a complaint and paid the filing fee for a civil action. (Docs. 1, 3). After conducting a preliminary review, the undersigned finds that Anderson’s complaint is an impermissible shotgun pleading and fails to allege a valid basis for this Court’s subject…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API