Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 14, 2021No. 121789PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 121,789 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. SIDNEY W. CLARK, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The right to appeal derives from statute. Therefore, as a general rule, appellate courts may exercise jurisdiction only when authorized to do so by statute. 2. Under the doctrine of stare decisis, points of law established by a court are generally followed by the same court and courts of lower rank in later cases in which the same legal issue is raised. 3. This court endeavors to adhere to precedent unless clearly convinced a rule of law established in its…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. DickeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. State v. WetrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. State v. RuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. City of Wichita v. TrotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  4. Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. StanekSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. In re N.E.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API