Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Owen v. Media One Direct, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 2013No. D061231PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, Acting P. J.
In this case we hold that California’s Corporations Commissioner (the Commissioner) properly exercised her statutory authority to issue an administrative subpoena duces tecum (SDT) and subpoena witnesses for the purpose of investigating possible violations of the Corporate Securities Law of 1968 (CSL) (Corp. Code, § 25000 et seq.), which regulates the offer and sale of securities in California. (Undesignated statutory references are to the Corporations Code.) We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it found that appellant failed to comply…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Saxena v. GoffneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Jazayeri v. MaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Alvarado v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- The LUCKMAN PARTNERSHIP, INC. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hambrick v. Healthcare Partners Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Best v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Chambers v. Crown Asset Management, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Hambrick v. Healthcare Partners Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.