Legal Opinion

Nationwide General Insurance Company v. Foust

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 4, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00714Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION Nationwide General Insurance Company, Civil Action No.: 1:21-cv-00714-JMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION James E. Foust, Defendant. Plaintiff Nationwide General Insurance Company brought the instant declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration as to whether Defendant James E. Foust satisfied the witness affidavit requirement of South Carolina Code Ann. § 38-77-170 (West 2022) sufficient to meet the threshold for uninsured motorist (“UM”) coverage under South Carolina insurance law. (ECF No. 1.) This…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API