Legal Opinion

Seneca Meadows, Inc. v. ECI Liquidating, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided October 26, 2000No. 95-CV-6400LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Seneca Meadows, Inc. (“SMI”) and Macedón Homes, Inc. (“MHI”) com menced this action in August 1995, asserting various causes of action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERC-LA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. Plaintiffs allege that the twenty-four named defendants were responsible for contamination at a landfill (“the Tantalo Site”) owned by SMI, and on certain property adjacent to the landfill (“the Adjacent Properties”), owned by both SMI and MHI. The original complaint, and the first…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Shirley Weigel v. Target Stores, a Division of Dayton Hudson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Prisco v. A & D Carting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northern Shipping Funds I, L.L.C. v. Icon Capital Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Ruffing v. Union Carbide Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2002
  3. New York v. Solvent Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2002
  4. Golden West Refining v. PriceWaterhouseDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API