Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Lyons

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1958No. Appeal, 216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Louis J. E. Fritz filed a complaint in assumpsit against Gilbert I. Lyons. Plaintiffs action was based on a two-year written contract of employment. Defendant filed an answer admitting the execution of the contract but averring that, “by mutual consent of the parties, said agreement was never put into effect”. The answer also contained a counterclaim, to which plaintiff replied. At the trial, after the introduction of plaintiffs testimony, counsel for defendant moved for a compulsory nonsuit on the ground of “estoppel by acquiescence”. This motion was overruled. Both…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Achenbach v. StoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Robbins v. WeinsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Kennedy's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Priester v. MillemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Muchow v. SCHAFFNER Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Brentwood Manor Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Easton Theatres, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Land & Mortgage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Solar Fuel Company v. United Mine Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Easton Theaters v. WELLS FARGO, ETC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API