Klinkert v. Streissguth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Sibley county to set aside a deed on the ground that it was obtained through false and fraudulent representations. The case was tried before Tifft, J., who directed the jury to answer in the affirmative the question set out in the second paragraph of the opinion, made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant. From an order denying his motion to amend the findings or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiff executed a deed to defendant on July 13, 1916, whereby, in consideration of the sum of $3,500, he conveyed-to her all the interest which he then had, or should thereafter acquire by will or inheritance from Thomas Klinkert, in 13 lots in the village of Arlington, Minnesota, and also all the interest which he then had, or should thereafter acquire by will or inheritance, in the personal property of said Thomas Klinkert, and also all the claims, demands and causes of action which he then had, or should thereafter have, against the estate of Theodore Streissguth, deceased.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Slawik v. LosethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Klinkert v. StreissguthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Arvidson v. SlaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931