Legal Opinion

Arvidson v. Slater

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1931No. Nos. 28,428, 28,429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Two actions were brought, one by Mary Arvidson to recover damages for personal injury claimed to have been caused by defendant George H. Slater in the driving and operating of his automobile, the other by Albert Arvidson, the husband of Mary, to recover for loss of her services and for medical and hospital expenses incurred and to be incurred in treating the wife for her injury. The two actions were tried together. There was a verdict in defendant’s favor in each case. Each plaintiff moved for a new trial and appeals from the order made denying the motion.

Mrs. Arvidson was in the employ of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Schlecht v. SchlechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Chase v. Tingdale Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. State ex rel. Pope v. Germania BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. First National Bank v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watson v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Sedlock v. Trosper (Two Cases)Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API