Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Ankenman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1983No. AO19563PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINBERG, J.

Ruth Ann Ankenman appeals from the amended interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage entered July 26, 1982, and from the order denying her motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473 to vacate a portion thereof. She contends that the trial court erred in awarding to respondent Harold D. Ankenman his military retirement as his separate property and that it abused its discretion in denying her motion to set aside the portion of the amended interlocutory judgment awarding the military retirement and to reserve jurisdiction over it. The dates during which…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re Marriage of SheldonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of GalloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Aloy v. MashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Thomas v. Lyles (In Re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1984
  4. Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Castiglioni v. CastiglioniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API