Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Regents of the University System
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 25, 1962No. 39474PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
l.(a) Where complaint is made of the exclusion of evidence offered by the movant’s witness, an assignment of error which fails to show what evidence was ex*818pected to be elicited or how it would have helped the movant is too incomplete for consideration. Mickle v. Moore, 188 Ga. 444 (5) (4 SE2d 217); Butler v. Ross, 188 Ga. 329 (6) (4 SE2d 21). Special grounds 4 and 5 of the amended motion for a new trial, which contend only that sustaining the objection of the condemnor to certain evidence offered by the condemnee “prevented counsel from showing what he intended to prove by this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Edmonds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Mickle v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Brunswick & Birmingham Railroad v. HoodenpyleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Harrison v. Regents of the University SystemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mabry v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- DeKalb County v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Derrick v. Rabun CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Daniel v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- HOUSING &C. CITY OF ATLANTA v. TroncalliCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.