Daniel v. Days Inn of America, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1DissentGoolsby, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the judgment reached by Chief Judge Sanders and Judge Cureton. In my view, no breach of any duty owed by the respondents Days Inn of America, Inc., and Nadia, Inc., proximately caused the appellant Elizabeth Daniel’s injuries and damages.
Judge Cureton writes that “a discussion of the [mjotel’s duty to [Mrs.] Daniel is inappropriate ... for the reason that the trial judge rejected that argument in granting summary judgment and no issue has been taken with that ruling.” I believe, however, that , discussion of the motel’s duty to Mrs. Daniel to protect her from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Orlando Executive Park, Inc. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Virginia D. v. Madesco Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Orlando Executive Park, Inc. v. PDRDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Aaser v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Green v. Atlanta & C. Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.