Harrison v. Regents of the University System
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
Grounds 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the amended motion for new trial complain that the trial judge did not permit questions propounded on cross-examination by counsel for the condemnees to the condemnor’s witnesses, Mr. W. Lee Brad-berry and Mr. Monroe Butler, to be answered. Grounds 4, 5, and 6 relate that the witness, Bradberry, had testified on direct examination as follows: “Q. Will you state your name please? A. W. Lee Bradberry. Q. Are you in the real-estate business here in Athens? A. Yes, sir. Q. Mr. Bradberry, how long have you been in the real-estate business in Athens? A. For…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Griffin v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Tillman v. BomarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by14 opinions
- Busbee v. University ProfessorsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Sutton v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Department of Transportation v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Big Apple Super Market of Peachtree, Inc. v. W. J. Milner & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Smaha v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.