Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Regents of the University System

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1959No. 37638PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

Grounds 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the amended motion for new trial complain that the trial judge did not permit questions propounded on cross-examination by counsel for the condemnees to the condemnor’s witnesses, Mr. W. Lee Brad-berry and Mr. Monroe Butler, to be answered. Grounds 4, 5, and 6 relate that the witness, Bradberry, had testified on direct examination as follows: “Q. Will you state your name please? A. W. Lee Bradberry. Q. Are you in the real-estate business here in Athens? A. Yes, sir. Q. Mr. Bradberry, how long have you been in the real-estate business in Athens? A. For…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Tillman v. BomarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Busbee v. University ProfessorsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Sutton v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Department of Transportation v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Big Apple Super Market of Peachtree, Inc. v. W. J. Milner & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Smaha v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API