Putnam v. Hedville State Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This appeal involves the right of a bank, as garnishee, to offset a note owed to the bank by the principal debtor against his deposit in the bank, in view of the circumstances here*535inafter stated. The trial court held against the bank and it has appealed.
The facts giving rise to the controversy, so far as here pertinent, are as follows: Plaintiff, residing and being engaged in business at Salina, owned cattle which were being pastured for him by one A1 Chapman, who was operating a farm and ranch. In some way plaintiff learned that on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Docking v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Meinhart v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Karner v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
- Drumm-Standish Commission Co. v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931