Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Hedville State Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1929No. 28,469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This appeal involves the right of a bank, as garnishee, to offset a note owed to the bank by the principal debtor against his deposit in the bank, in view of the circumstances here*535inafter stated. The trial court held against the bank and it has appealed.

The facts giving rise to the controversy, so far as here pertinent, are as follows: Plaintiff, residing and being engaged in business at Salina, owned cattle which were being pastured for him by one A1 Chapman, who was operating a farm and ranch. In some way plaintiff learned that on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Docking v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Meinhart v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Karner v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
  2. Drumm-Standish Commission Co. v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API