Legal Opinion

Karner v. Willis

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 31, 1985No. 56,535PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Parks, J.:

Plaintiffs, Herbert and Ruth Karner, are the judgment creditors of defendants, Willis and Lloyd. Plaintiffs obtained an order of garnishment against defendant Lloyd’s bank account with garnishee, Kanopolis State Bank (Bank), in seeking to collect on their judgment. The Bank answered that it had no funds belonging to defendant because it had exercised its right of setoff against his account. The plaintiffs contended that the setoff was wrongful but the district court disagreed. Plaintiffs appeal from the court’s decision.

A bank has the right to set off any mature claim or obligation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Iola State Bank v. BolanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Allied Sheet Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. Peoples National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Olsen v. Valley National Bank of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Celco, Inc. of America v. Davis Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bell Credit Union, United States of America v. Golden Plains Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Karner v. WillisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. Security Bank of Kansas City v. Tripwire Operations GroupCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
  4. Karner v. WillisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API