Legal Opinion

Rosales v. Depuy Ace Medical Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2000No. S078119PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

Labor Code section 4558 (section 4558) provides an exception to the exclusivity of the workers’ compensation system for workers injured as a result of the employer’s knowingly having removed or failed to install a point of operation guard on a “power press,” defined in subdivision (a)(4) of the statute as “any material-forming machine that utilizes a die which is designed for use in the manufacture of other products.” The issue presented in this case is, generally, the meaning of “die” for purposes of section 4558 and, specifically, whether the tool used in the power lathe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. EubanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Baluyut v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State of California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ceja v. J. R. Wood, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. LeFiell Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Islas v. D & G Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Gilbert Moreno v. Alstom Power, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Herrera v. Unistar Food Processing CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Rosales v. Depuy Ace Medical Co.California Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API