Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Drobny

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1948No. 34,529PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Plaintiff is the owner of the E% NE% of section 2, township 120, range 46, Lac qui Parle county, hereinafter referred to as the east 80. He also owns the SW% NW^ of section 1, adjoining it on the east, upon which his farm buildings are located. Defendant Manford O. Erdahl is the owner of the adjoining W% NE% of section 2, hereinafter referred to as the west 80, and the NE% NW% of section 2, same township and range. His farm buildings are located on the west 80.

For some years past, Erdahl and his predecessors in ownership of the west 80 have driven their vehicles,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keiter v. BergeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Morse v. ZeizeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Carpenter v. GantzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Klenk v. Town of Walnut LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Dickinson v. RubleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flynn v. BeiselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Daugherty v. SowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Neill v. HakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API