Legal Opinion

People v. Schottey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from superior court of Grand Rapids; Burlingame, J. John Schottey was convicted of violating the liquor law.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The respondent was convicted on a jury trial in the superior court of Grand Rapids upon the charge of having kept his saloon open on Sunday, the 1st day of August, 1897. The cause comes into this court upon exceptions before sentence. The assignments of error are all based upon portions of the charge of the court.

It appears that the saloon of the respondent is a building about 25 by 40 feet. In the front part is the saloon. Back of this are the living rooms. There is a front door to the saloon, opening out upon the street, and at the rear is a door opening into the living rooms. On the north…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. NeumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People v. RepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kurtz v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. People v. WaldvogelMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HeikkalaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. ButtsMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State v. DonaldsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. TolmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API