Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Five Boro Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc. & Van-Tulco, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 25, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan J. Saks, J.), entered December 5, 1990, pursuant to an order of the same court, dated November 29, 1990, which granted petitioner’s application to confirm an arbitration award, and denied respondent’s cross-motion to *559vacate or modify such award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

There is no merit to respondent’s contention that the arbitrator’s interpretation of the contract is irrational. An arbitrator’s interpretation of the parties’ contract is not subject to judicial challenge "even where 'the apparent, or even the plain, meaning of the words’ of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Maross Construction, Inc. v. Central New York Regional Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Kingsley v. Redevco Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Kingsley v. Redevco Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Etkin & Company, Inc. & Play It Again Apparel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API